I confirm the effectiveness of ceramizers. I used 3 types of ceramizers: for the engine, gearbox and fuel. Already after driving a few hundred km, the operation of the engine became quieter and more even, the blows of exhaust gases into the oil sump were significantly reduced. The gearbox became quieter and the gears began to enter lighter. I used Ceramizer for fuel in another engine from Skoda 120, the engine sometimes went out at slow speeds, after an hour of driving slow revs returned and the engine began to work better.
Anonymous
Here is my opinion on. ceramizer designed for car engines, supported by the results of measurements. However, I did not limit myself only to measuring the compression pressure, but additionally carried out measurements of the sound level (i.e. engine volume) in the cabin of the vehicle. I applied Ceramizer to the Skoda 120L car (1989, mileage 82 thousand km) with a carburetor gasoline engine with a displacement of 1174 cm3, as an addition to mineral oil.
According to the recommendations, I added the preparation to the heated oil in the engine (after about 30 minutes of driving) and left at idle for 25 minutes. After approx. 15 minutes the engine speed increased significantly (it is a carburetor engine, so the revolutions do not regulate themselves) but at the same time the engine calmed down – which is proof of the reduction in friction of all friction elements in the engine. The first 200 km I drove with max. speed of 60 km/h. After driving 220 km, I started to drive faster – the car noticeably more vividly began to react to the gas pedal, it became possible to drive at lower speeds in higher gears (the engine freely works in 4th gear at 40 km / h – here previously the minimum speed was about 50 km / h), which has a significant impact on fuel consumption. I made measurements of the sound level (noise) in the driver’s cab – with a class I type 2238 sound level meter from Bruel-Kjaer with the characteristics of the “A” meter (consistent with the feeling of the human ear) activated. Since the measurement results are given in decibels (nonlinear scale) – I also give the calculated observed difference in percentage.
The exact results of the noise measurement with a description of the test methodology can be found here (click).
Results (average of 10 measurements) below:
1. Before ceramisation:
(a) Idling speed (cold engine, first measurement 15 s after starting): 54.8 dB
b) turnover at max. suction (approx. 3-3.5 thousand rpm): 69.2 dB
2. After ceramisation:
(a) idling speed (cold engine, first measurement 15 s after starting): 54,0 dB (noise reduction of 8,8 %)
b) turnover at max. suction (approx. 3-3.5 thousand rpm): 67.5 dB (noise reduction by 18.7%)
As you can see, the difference is important and gives dimension to the subjective feeling of reducing the volume – in my case I had the impression (especially at intersections at red lights) that the engine simply went out, but it worked – quieter. Since the idle speed was higher than before the preparation was administered, they were manually reduced by me (carburetor) because there was no need to keep them at this level (which of course results in a further reduction in fuel consumption). Engines with fuel injection do not need to be adjusted, because they regulate themselves – here the reduction of the fuel dose (for the same piston work) is carried out automatically.
After driving approx. 1500 km I also carried out compression pressure measurements. However, it should be noted that the engine was after the mileage of approx. 30 thousand. km from the renovation and I did not need to raise the compression pressure much, but the difference appeared – the pressure increased to the level to which it was possible.
Here are the results for individual cylinders before applying ceramizer (in kPa):
1. 1,18
2. 1,20
3. 1,18
4. 1,22
After ceramization:
1. 1,22
2. 1,24
3. 1,20
4. 1,25
In any case, an increase in compression pressure is visible. In general, the car reacts more vividly to the gas pedal, accelerates better in higher gears. Of course, the great advantage is the ease of ignition of the engine – elimination of “dry” engine starts, easier ignition in winter. All the advantages of the manufacturer are confirmed in practice. Now it’s time for more tests – a preparation for gearboxes and an additive to fuel, and – the next cars. I would like to congratulate the manufacturer, provide detailed results and data from the measurements, and wish him further success. Greetings!
Jarosław Jóźwik, Gdansk
year of prod. 2003
mileage 269000
The car drove in my company and as such was quite heavily exploited, as I bought it back it was already heard characteristic of diesel “patting” and loss of power which with a mileage of about 260,000 was not so strange. The characteristic metallic reverberation and “shaking” of the steering wheel was also a problem. At first I thought about renovating the engine, but after various consultations I was visited from it, as it took maybe not much oil and nowhere liquid.
I was looking for another method to increase the compression and came across your product, which I approached a little skeptically, although encouraged by the graphs from the dynamometer.
But to the point, I poured only one dose at the beginning, and it looked like this: Warsaw-Nidzica route, I warmed up the engine.
At the gas station outside Warsaw I poured a dose into the oil, after about five minutes you could hear the engine getting quieter, and it was not my subjective feeling after the passengers noticed the same thing, later the route to Nidzica, I kept the revolutions to 2500 but you could already hear that inside it is quieter and you did not have to “abuse” your voice to talk, it was felt that the engine pulls from 1500 revolutions and not as before from 2000, the steering wheel stopped shaking which I admit earlier terribly irritated me, and this characteristic metallic reverberation became soft, not metallic. Now, after driving about 10,000 km, I can safely say that the combustion has dropped by about 0.5 L and with my as much as the car allows, dynamic driving is a lot.
As soon as I do a big review and replace the timing belt, it will definitely flood the next dose.
And I did not mention the start-up, to be honest the battery is suitable for replacement and when the compression came back to feel that the battery is replaceable, but as it turns it again you can hear a beautiful kick from the first touch.
David Czaja
Warsaw 3.04.2008r.
I confirm the effectiveness of ceramizers. I used in my car with a mileage of 144 thousand. km ceramizer for engine, gearbox and fuel refiner. After driving 100km I noticed the first effects of the preparation. Full processing occurred after driving about 3000km, I still did not notice any changes. I ride a lot on short routes. Before the ceramizer was used, the engine work was terrible, the engine was very noisy, the acceleration was poor, the engine reacted poorly to the gas pedal, accelerated faster only with the gas pedal pressed to the resistance. Strange vibrations could be heard depending on the rotational speed of the engine. Fuel burning was too high. The engine began to accelerate above 2200 rpm.
After driving about 1500km I noticed an improvement in the engine’s work, the engine was quiet, worked evenly, vibrations were lower, acceleration was already better, the engine reacted to the gas pedal. After driving approx. 3000 km engine has become very quiet and sensitive to the position of the gas pedal, it begins to accelerate from about 1700 rpm. Fuel consumption has decreased. Outside the city, combustion is approx. 4l/100km. You can no longer hear the annoying vibrations of the engine. The operation of the engine is pleasant to the ear and at higher speeds in 5th gear you can hear mainly the noise of air flowing around the cabin of the vehicle, the engine work is gently audible. Driving at speeds of 120 – 150 km/h is comfortable. The maximum speed is higher than the factory one. The engine starts very well and quickly.
After applying the ceramizer, the gearbox works quietly, the gears turn on slightly /before application they turned on hard/. I highly recommend the use of ceramizers. This is an effective way to improve the performance of the car and driving comfort. I also pay attention to the removal of defects in the car, engine, replacement of filters, oils, fluids, the correctness of the operation of the ukł. brake, etc. In cars without defects, the effects of ceramizers are guaranteed.
Now I’m going to apply ceramizer to the power steering system. I also expect great effects in improving the operation of the system. After applying ceramizers, driving a car became very pleasant!
Best regards, Mariusz J.
Opinion sent on 26.05.2009
Year of Build: 2007
Engine capacity: 1.4 TDI
Mileage: 184 thousand. Miles
Opinion: I used Ceramizer CS in a 3-cylinder diesel engine equipped with pump-injectors. The use of the preparation was necessary because the engine had a high mileage, was very loud, accelerated with difficulty, i.e. was not very dynamic. Below pr. Rotational 2.5 thousand rpm engine had difficulty maintaining rotational speed did not have acceleration. The loud operation of the hydraulic valve tappets was felt, especially when the engine was cold. After driving 200 km, I have already noticed the first effects of using Ceramizer. After driving 2,000 km, I observed the following changes:
quiet engine operation – the biggest change at high engine speeds
less engine vibration
even engine idling
better acceleration – the engine accelerates already afterwards. 2 thousand rpm
lower fuel consumption about 0.5 to 0.8 l/100km
the engine heats up longer, which proves that the preparation lowers the wsp. friction of metal materials.
To sum up, driving a car after the engine ceramization process is very comfortable.
Mariusz Jurkowski
Opinion sent on 05.11.2012
I am a user of Skoda Octavia 1.9 TDI / 90 HP / year 2001. After a mileage of about 140,000 km, I applied ceramizer to the engine. The car is regularly serviced at an authorized SKODA station. Full documentation. I am pleased to say that the oil loss after 15,000 km is really small, I did not happen to add oil in the period between replacements. The oil loss varies within about 3-5 mm on the scoop. Today I have a mileage of over 211,000 km and the engine “holds” the parameters just like a new one. I have a comparison, because a colleague has a year younger Octavia with less mileage and regularly replenishes the oil between changes. Cars are operated in very similar conditions and in a similar way. I think the reason for this is the use of Ceramizer. Despite the fact that I have a higher mileage of about 50,000 km, my car does not kick as much as a colleague. I am by nature very cautious in the use of the so-called. refiners and other similar inventions. However, I can say that this measure certainly did not hurt and I have the impression that it helped the engine. I wonder if I should apply it again, because since I poured it, I have driven over 70,000 km.
Miroslaw Dorawa
I delayed the comment only to see if the product actually works and … it turns out that it actually works as in the product description. I poured into Octavka 1.9tdi at 230thousand. I really recommend both the seller and the product itself. arek-07
My car is a Skoda Rapid 136 5 speed gearbox. I applied Ceramizer to the box because the reduction from 3 to 2 always caused a crunch in the box. After about 200-250 km from the application, the crunches happened less and less often and the chest began to walk more quietly. Now it is after about 2000km from the application of ceramizer grinds at all there are no gears easier to enter and the box almost can not be heard. Ceramizer I applied 15-03-2006, the effect is observed to this day.
Leszek Cięka
Transaction carried out quickly and efficiently! Ceramizer works excellently. Skoda before pouring the agent took 1l of oil per 1000 km, after pouring ceramizer the car stopped smoking from the vedech pipe and now takes 0.3l of oil per 1000 km. Recommend!!!
Zbyszek89